Post by John (NJ)Post by jsAs for smoking: I'm not a smoker, but I'm not a fan of legislating behavior
either. And you ARE aware that Big Pharm and insurance cos. like Pfizer are
happily writing checks to push for anti-smoking regulations, right? All the
better to sell Nicorette patches and reduce the actuarial risk tables by
.01%. Not that it matters to the anti smoking zealots, who have adopter the
Machiavellian "enemy of my enemy" philosophy.
Are you saying that because Pfizer could make money selling a product
that helps people quit smoking it's therefore bad? To take it to the
exteme level of the rest of your post (below), if Nicorette works and
all smokers use it and quit then demand for the product will dry up,
it will no longer be profitable and Pfizer will have to make a living
elsewhere.
Nicorette doesn't work, though. Not as a stop-smoking aid.
Post by John (NJ)Post by jsHell, next thing you know, people will be complaining that there are too
many drunks in bars, and want to ban alcohol. I can seriously envision a
world not to long form now where dopes will walk into fake "British Pub"
chains and drink alcohol free beer and mock whiskey while throwing foam
tipped nerf darts and settling for a Quiz Night where the questions are so
easy that �"everyone's a winner"! Maybe they'll hire actors to stage a bar
brawl once or twice a night for "authenticity"
You may imagine this scenerio, but such extremes don't exist.
Post by jsYou walk into a bar, you know what you're getting into.
Not really. I've played in many different types of establishments,
all of which call themselves "bars." Some we referred to as "Park-and-
Punches," bars where we expected at least one fight per night. We
worked hard to get out of those dumps and book nicer rooms. I've
noticed that the rooms we play that charge $4.50 to $5.50 for a pint
of beer don't have bar fights, clean their restrooms and pay the bands
more. That's where we book.
But that's not really a bar. It's Disneyland with beer taps. This is
so very much exactly the point... when my parents stopped in Las
Vegas around 1970, *we could not go past a certain point in certain
buildings because we understood that adults were doing adult
things there*. But hey, don't let me get between Steve Wynn
and a buck...
People pay $5.50... for a *pint*??? And you're trying to say these
people aren't essentially yuppie scum? :) ( I keed - no offense,
five-fiddy? Sheesh. What's a cheap Scotch neat, $35?)
Fi-fiddy. Holy cow.
I paid that for a crappy Budweiser at the Bronco Bowl when I
saw Knopfler, but geez.... that's concert prices.
Times like this, I miss Hunter S. Thompson.
Post by John (NJ)Post by jsDeal with it. Don't like it? Play weddings. �It's the pussyification of the world, I tell ya...
Not wanting to breath in shitty, smoke-filled air is hardly the
pussyfication of anything.
And again... just not going in was out of the question, right? Perhaps
starting an establishment that was nonsmoking, or habituating
one that was, was also apparently out of the question.
No, we must Go Get The Law, and *then* it'll all be okey dokey. Because
unless there's regulation of every aspect of human behavior, why....
we just can't have that, can we? It's be like letting kids play
in an unstructured manner, rather than having Little League
parents gettin' their rage on in the stands.
Somebody might actually spheckin' *enjoy* themselves, and...
that wouldn't be fair to the other children, would it?
Good thing Americans are good at taking orders, because
when the Chinese reposess the darned country, they won't
wanna have to say things twice, I tell ya.
Post by John (NJ)Non-smokers have had to "deal with it" for
years. The tide has turned. Deal with it.
For what it is worth.... I have never personally been to a bar (
past age 18) when I wasn't booking it or playing it. I do not
personally understand why anybody ever goes to those places,
especially for live music. I don't do work happy hours, I might
play a party with people from work ( but probably not ) and
I certainly don't wanna hang out and watch 15,283 big screen TVs
with The Fuse.tv Network on 7,823 of them and whatever Albanian
soccer/cage matches on the rest.
The point is that it was a *public* place, where people could *do*
those sorts of things. And then "public interest" propagandists
decided to engineer public sentiment against it ( much as tobacco
advertising had engineered public sentiment *for* smoking).
So as long as we're clear on the fact that both sides are
mindless robots, pursuing their particular version of "stars
on thars", I'm good. It leaves all the synthetic moral outrage
in place to keep the useless debate going, which reinforces
each side's sense of self. After all, the Hearst-style "us
against them" thing is what it's all about, isn't it?
And if it gets real good, somebody throw a chair. Niiiiice.
Post by John (NJ)In NJ every bar owner I know loves the smoking ban. The smarter ones
set up outdoor smoking areas complete with heaters and some sort of
cover. Some have even set up separate outdoor bars with TVs, jukebox
and wait service. They made a small investment to make sure everybody
feels welcome in their establishment.
And I am sure everybody will LIVE FOREVER! YAY! I won't be there,
because I friggin' hate bars. Unless I am playing in one. Which
probably is not going to happen much in the future, because
they're full of smug, self-important, health-obsessed douchebags,
when they're not populated with aging, degenerate alcoholics.
Maybe they should bring in stair machines, all connected to generators,
so the clubowner can sell some juice back to the network. I mean,
who has time to go to the gym, right? Probably get $5.50 a set for
the privilege of generating electricity.
Fi-fiddy. Yup.
--
Les Cargill