Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerYour dispute with those two had nothing to do with this group until
you brought it here.
Enjoy that delusion, but that's not what the posting record shows.
The posting record shows that you and Carr had an agreement that you
would stay out of this group, and you came back after he was dead.
Real honorable of you, Sokolich.
Nice try, coward, but no cigar. What the posting record shows is that the
sociopath and lying sack of shit, Jim Carr, broke his part of the
agreement, and that by doing so rendered the agreement null and void.
Also, the attempt by a coward like you to pontificate about what's
honorable is a real belly laugh.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerProve your "victim" status, Gary.
The proof is a matter of public record. Look it up....coward.
Looking you and your various aliases proves one thing: that
you're somewhat obsessed with Jim Carr and to a lesser extent,
Mike Reaves. They are both dead.
You wouldn't recognize a proof if it hit you in the
face.....dickless coward.
Also, the name of the dead dirtbag to whom you refer is Mike
Rieves, aka Porky aka Sir Lurksalot.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerAre you really having that much trouble finding work?
Only in your dreams......coward.
Then what's the problem? If Gary Sokolich is able to get
work, then Gary Sokolich's claims are "defamation" are
unfounded.
Either you never took even an introductory course in logical
thinking or you failed it miserably.
Also, the fact that a legal claim of defamation can no longer be
pursued doesn't mean that the defamation did not occur.
You have to prove damages. Do you have substantive proof that
Carr and Rieves damaged your professional reputation or ability
to find work in any tangible way?
First of all, there is a one year statute of limitations for
filing a defamation claim. Also, pursuing legal action against
low-life dirtbags like Jim Carr and Mike Rieves, neither of whom
have any significant assets, would be a waste of time and money.
In other words, you have nothing in the way of proof,
The proof is a matter of public record.
It is "public record" that your professional reputation was damaged
as a result of what Carr or Rieves posted about you?
Do you have any suggestions on how to go about making that
determination?
Your continued screeches of "defamation!" make it pretty clear that
you have already made that determination. Yet you have never shown
any proof.
What's clear is that you are in serious need of a remedial course in
reading comprehension. The defamation is a matter of public record, and
there is no simple or practical way to assess the damages. If you are
unable to comprehend the difference between defamation and damages, then
cry out from under your mother's skirt and ask her to explain it to you.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker Slayerand you are
still avoiding the question: did either Carr or Rieves damage your
professional reputation in any tangible way?
Since there is a one year statute of limitations on filing a
defamation claim, your question is a baltantly irrelevant red herring.
It's a simple yes or no question, Gary. Your continued dancing
around the question speaks volumes.
It's an unanswerable question, and you are the one who is doing the
dancing.
So you have continued a vendetta against a dead man over an
unanswerable question?
How long do you intend to continue sucking Jim Carr's room-temperature
decomposing dick?
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerSeems to me that your
pwn posting damage your reputation far more than those two could,
even if they had wanted to.
Dream on....
Does Gary Sokolich think that his stalking, obsessive behavior
enhances his professional reputation?
Only after he stopped beating his wife and his neighbor's dog.
Gary Sokolich claims to have been defamed but refuses to offer proof.
The proof is a matter of public record.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerIf that's the
case, then Gary Sokolich should really get a fucking life and
stop posting about a dead guy.>>>
Perhaps you should get a fucking life and stop posting for the
same reason....dickless coward.
You first, Gary.
You first...dickless coward.
You just keep telling yourself that, Gary Sokolich.
You are and will remain a dickless coward until such time as you
crawl out from under your mother's skirt and post using your real
name.
You first.
So far, you are the only dickless coward who is involved in this
exchange and who is hiding under his mother's skirt.
And yet you are still not posting under your real name.
You came back
to this group, violating the spirit of an agreement you had with a man
who is now dead.
Jim Carr didn't violate the spirit of the agreement. He violated the
agreement....and the fact that the sociopathic scumbag and lying sack of
shit is now dead is irrelevant.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoNewsgroups: alt.guitar.bass
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Re: What's going I. In here besides nothing? "I rarely stop in,
and when I do, I see that completely useless You_Know_Who and
Scott vomiting their nonsense."
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.bass
Subject: Re: What's going I. In here besides nothing?
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:20:24 -0700
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.bass
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:39:19 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Scott the Coward in Florida
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/scott$20in$20florida$20-ri
ck
Sorry Gary Sokolich, you'll have to do much better than that. The
"Scott" that Corey is referring to is in Canada, not Florida. I
am neither of those Scotts.
Of course your'e not. Corry just pulled that unsolicited reference
out of his ass for no reason at all.
He is referring to a different Scott, who lives in Canada and has
been known to be rather confrontational in this group.
Maybe you should let Corey speak for himself, because there is no
Scott who lives in Canada, who has ever posted to this cesspool using
Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118.
No kidding, genius. The Scott that Corey is referring to, the one who
lives in Canada, doesn't use Agent. He uses Google Groups.
Corey was clearly referring to a post by a "Scott" who posted using Forte
Agent 4.2/32.1118, not by a "Scott" in Canada who was posting via Google.
Maybe Corey was so doped up on drugs at the time that he was unaware of
what he was actually saying.
Post by Stalker SlayerThe Scott
that Corey is referring to is not the "Scott in Florida" from your
ten-year-old post, and he is also not me, and I am not "Scott in
Florida".
Then, why don't you should crawl out from underneath your mother's skirt
and post using you real name and prove it.
Post by Stalker SlayerYou are looking for something that simply is not there,
which calls other claims of yours into question. Like defamation
claims, for exmple.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/non%20sequitur
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerYour desperation
has led you to jump to a totally unsupported conclusion.
Calling attention to an interesting correlation/coincidence is not an
indication of desperation and does not not constitute a conclusion.
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerA 10-year-old post from a guy who happened to use the same
newsreader means jack shit.
It certainly doesn't mean jack shit when taken in isolation. But
you have a long track record of posts to other newsgroups which, not
surprisingly, involve others who reside in this cesspool.
Really, Gary? I do? Please do enlighten me with your expertise.
It's not just a 10-year-old post from a guy who happened to use the
same newsreader. It's the same version of Forte Agent, the same build
number and the exact same serial number. And, there are several other
interesting coincidences. Maybe Stott in Florida is also a dickless
coward who also hides under your mother's skirt.
Name these other "interesting coincidences".
After you start posting uisng your real name....coward.
Post by Stalker SlayerAnd there is no serial
number in the headers. Now you're making even less sense.
Call the Forte Agent ID 4.2/32.1118 whatever you wish, but the fact of the
matter is that it is suffient to enable one to group the very few who have
used it to post to this cesspool
Post by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPost by you_know_whoPost by Stalker SlayerPlease try harder in the
future, Gary Sokolich. Your internet detective skills are
lacking.
In the unlikely event that the need should arise, there are
experienced professionals who are more than caspable of lifting the
skirts of mothers under which dickless cowards like you hide.
Bring it on, Gary Sokolich. I could use the amusement.
You could also use a real life....which you obviously do not have.
Aww, run out of empty threats, Gary?
The fact that two lying, sociopathic scumbags met their maker at nearly the
same time isn't a coincidence. So, if I were you, I'd look up the curse,
and take it seriously.
Post by Stalker SlayerI'm not the one continuing some obsessive vendetta against two men who
are now dead.
No...you are the coward who posts while hiding underneath his mother's
skirt, and who is clearly pursuing his own obsessive vendetta.